Child custody cases that involve domestic violence in California are extremely complex and can come with a myriad of emotional and financial challenges. Understanding California Family Code 3044 – FAM § 3044 and its position within the broader framework of domestic violence laws in the state can help parents work to preserve the best interests of their child when determining custody arrangements.
As Family Code 3044 is complex and can be difficult to interpret for each domestic violence child custody case, it can be deeply beneficial to have experienced and knowledgeable support from a family lawyer. A dedicated domestic violence lawyer from Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP, can analyze the details of your case and help you understand how this statute may impact your options and outcomes, working to pursue an effective avenue for your circumstances.
Family Code 3044 defines domestic violence as the reckless or intentional infliction of physical injury or sexual assault or instilling serious fear of imminent bodily injury in a domestic setting. The definition of domestic violence can also be extended to include behaviors like harassing, threatening, striking, destroying property, or disturbing the peace. California domestic violence cases can have a serious impact on family law cases, such as child custody arrangements.
When a California court is deciding on a custody order, they will need to determine whether Family Code 3044 applies to the case. If they find that it is applicable, they are required to inform all parties about the section, providing them with a copy before custody mediation commences.
If the California court discovers that an individual who is trying to pursue custody has carried out domestic violence within the past five years, a rebuttable presumption will arise. This presumption, which notably can be challenged, determines that giving custody to the domestic violence perpetrator would be detrimental to the best interests of the child.
To challenge the presumption, the perpetrator must provide ample and comprehensive evidence that shows giving them parental custody would indeed be in the child’s best interest. During this decision-making process, the court will consider certain factors, such as:
To prove that an instance of domestic violence was carried out within the past five years, convictions or court findings related to conduct must be available. The court is required to consider all admissible, relevant evidence. Notably, they cannot merely rely on family court services staff recommendations or child custody evaluators’ conclusions. If the court ultimately decides that the presumptions are rebutted, they must provide reasons in writing.
A dedicated and experienced family lawyer from Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP, can help you understand how Section 3044 of the Family Code in California may affect your child custody case, giving you comprehensive legal guidance to pursue optimal case outcomes and protect your rights.
A: Section 3044 of the California Family Code states the presumption that giving custody to an individual who has been found guilty of instances of domestic violence within the past five years goes against the best interest of the child. The only way to override this presumption is to present evidence that this custody arrangement would be in the best interest of the child.
A: No, it is against the law to keep your child from another parent without a court order. In California, both parents have an equal right to custody and visitation unless the court has made an order declaring otherwise. If your child is being kept from you by the other parent, and there is no issued court order, a compassionate and experienced family lawyer can help you navigate the case.
A: No, the mother is not automatically given full custody in California. Because custody decisions are made with the best interests of the child in mind, each parent is considered to have an equal right to custody and visitation unless there are extenuating circumstances. For example, in situations of domestic violence, if the mother of the child was the victim of the crime and the father was the perpetrator, she could be granted full custody under Section 3044.
A: In a dispute over legal and physical custody of a child, the biggest mistake that can be made is not putting the best interest of the child first. In custody battles, parents may choose to put their personal interests first, sacrificing the mental and physical well-being of the child or children involved.
Parents who do not comply with court orders or carry out behavior that goes against the child’s best interest can also seriously damage their case, sacrificing their chances of a positive case outcome.
If you are involved in a domestic violence case in California, and children are part of the equation, you are likely trying to understand how Family Code 3044 may impact your case. A skilled family lawyer from Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP, can analyze the details of your case, consider your concerns and goals, and help you navigate key domestic violence statutes to preserve the best interests of your child and family. Contact us today.
"*" indicates required fields
© Copyrights 2024 Quinn & Dworakowski LLP. All Rights reserved Disclaimer|Site Map|Privacy Policy